Re: debuggers

shyamal@seas.smu.edu (Shyamal Prasad)
Thu, 11 Nov 1993 01:19:07 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Debuggers harvard!rutgers!spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!vir (1987-03-15)
Re: Debuggers decvax!decwrl!mips!himel (1987-03-23)
Debuggers fabio@dcs.edinburgh.ac.uk (1991-08-08)
How long does it take to build a compiler? ywlee@sparc0a.cs.uiuc.edu (Youngwhan Lee) (1993-10-27)
Re: How long does it take to build a compiler? maniattb@cs.rpi.edu (1993-11-10)
Re: debuggers zstern@adobe.com (1993-11-11)
Re: debuggers shyamal@seas.smu.edu (1993-11-11)
Re: debuggers wjw@eb.ele.tue.nl (1993-11-11)
debuggers ssimmons@convex.com (1993-11-11)
Re: debuggers sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com (1993-11-11)
Re: debuggers sean@PICARD.TAMU.EDU (1993-11-12)
Re: debuggers henry@zoo.toronto.edu (1993-11-14)
Re: debuggers zstern@adobe.com (1993-11-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: shyamal@seas.smu.edu (Shyamal Prasad)
Keywords: debug
Organization: SMU - School of Engineering & Applied Science - Dallas
References: 93-10-124 93-11-062
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1993 01:19:07 GMT

maniattb@cs.rpi.edu (Bill Maniatty) writes:
>One beef that I have with most debuggers I use (gdb, sdb, dbx, ...) is
>that on most workstations under unix, the debuggers do NOT use hardware
>defined break points, so that I cannot set watch on a data location.


gdb on running on a DEC Station 5000 under ULTRIX allows watch points.
However, it does *not* use the hardware and runs about 10 to a 100
times slower.


I have used them one time when I was really sunk...they *do* work. I
don't know about sdb/dbx though.


I hope I have not repeated the obvious :-)


Cheers!
Shyamal
--
Shyamal Prasad, Department of Computer Science
Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX 75275, USA
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.