Related articles |
---|
[2 earlier articles] |
Re: Debuggers harvard!rutgers!spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!vir (1987-03-15) |
Re: Debuggers decvax!decwrl!mips!himel (1987-03-23) |
Debuggers fabio@dcs.edinburgh.ac.uk (1991-08-08) |
How long does it take to build a compiler? ywlee@sparc0a.cs.uiuc.edu (Youngwhan Lee) (1993-10-27) |
Re: How long does it take to build a compiler? maniattb@cs.rpi.edu (1993-11-10) |
Re: debuggers zstern@adobe.com (1993-11-11) |
Re: debuggers shyamal@seas.smu.edu (1993-11-11) |
Re: debuggers wjw@eb.ele.tue.nl (1993-11-11) |
debuggers ssimmons@convex.com (1993-11-11) |
Re: debuggers sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com (1993-11-11) |
Re: debuggers sean@PICARD.TAMU.EDU (1993-11-12) |
Re: debuggers henry@zoo.toronto.edu (1993-11-14) |
Re: debuggers zstern@adobe.com (1993-11-15) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | shyamal@seas.smu.edu (Shyamal Prasad) |
Keywords: | debug |
Organization: | SMU - School of Engineering & Applied Science - Dallas |
References: | 93-10-124 93-11-062 |
Date: | Thu, 11 Nov 1993 01:19:07 GMT |
maniattb@cs.rpi.edu (Bill Maniatty) writes:
>One beef that I have with most debuggers I use (gdb, sdb, dbx, ...) is
>that on most workstations under unix, the debuggers do NOT use hardware
>defined break points, so that I cannot set watch on a data location.
gdb on running on a DEC Station 5000 under ULTRIX allows watch points.
However, it does *not* use the hardware and runs about 10 to a 100
times slower.
I have used them one time when I was really sunk...they *do* work. I
don't know about sdb/dbx though.
I hope I have not repeated the obvious :-)
Cheers!
Shyamal
--
Shyamal Prasad, Department of Computer Science
Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX 75275, USA
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.