Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers

Freek.Wiedijk@phil.ruu.nl (Freek Wiedijk)
Fri, 29 Oct 1993 18:22:15 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[13 earlier articles]
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers mps@dent.uchicago.edu (1993-10-28)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (1993-10-28)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers raymondc@microsoft.com (1993-10-28)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers adk@sun13.SCRI.FSU.EDU (1993-10-29)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers elliottm@csulb.edu (1993-10-29)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers jvn@fermi.clas.virginia.edu (Julian V. Noble) (1993-10-29)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers Freek.Wiedijk@phil.ruu.nl (1993-10-29)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers synaptx!thymus!daveg@uunet.UU.NET (Dave Gillespie) (1993-10-29)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers rfg@netcom.com (1993-10-30)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers qualtrak@netcom.com (1993-10-30)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers johnson@cs.uiuc.edu (1993-10-31)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers henry@zoo.toronto.edu (1993-10-31)
Re: Folk Theorem: Assemblers are superior to Compilers drraymon@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca (1993-11-01)
[8 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: Freek.Wiedijk@phil.ruu.nl (Freek Wiedijk)
Keywords: performance, comment
Organization: Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
References: 93-10-104
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1993 18:22:15 GMT

elliottm@csulb.edu (Mike Elliott) writes:
> Folk Theorems:
>[assember code is 1) faster and 2) smaller than compiler code]


All I know is that my favorite word processor (WriteNow for
the Mac) is written in assembly. It's the fastest and
smallest word processor on the Mac that I know of.


Freek
[It occurs to me that a salient point is that PC software is becoming more a
consumer item than a traditional computer product, where cost reduction is
a lot more important than we're accustomed to think. Consider embedded
high volume chips in cars and the like -- they do all sorts of gross assembler
hacks to get the memory size to an absolute minimum and to allow them to use
the slowest, cheapest chip that they can. -John]
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.