Re: lcc intel backend?

dobrien@seas.gwu.edu (David O'Brien)
Fri, 15 Oct 1993 01:17:23 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
lcc intel backend? nick@nsis.cl.nec.co.jp (1993-10-07)
Re: lcc intel backend? wjw@eb.ele.tue.nl (1993-10-11)
Re: lcc intel backend? cwf@research.att.com (1993-10-12)
Re: lcc intel backend? nick@nsis.cl.nec.co.jp (1993-10-12)
Re: lcc intel backend? dobrien@seas.gwu.edu (1993-10-15)
Re: lcc intel backend? pcg@aber.ac.uk (1993-10-18)
Re: lcc intel backend? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1993-10-19)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: dobrien@seas.gwu.edu (David O'Brien)
Keywords: GCC, performance, C
Organization: George Washington University
References: 93-10-041 93-10-058
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1993 01:17:23 GMT

Gavin Thomas Nicol (nick@nsis.cl.nec.co.jp) wrote:
: I should note that from the lcc papers I've read, it seems like it is much
: faster, and much smaller than gcc, but code generation is not as good. ...


I am assuming the papers you are refering to are the 3 papers included
with the anonymous ftp distribution. If I remember correctly they
compaired lcc to gcc v1.x. Does anyone have any idea how the current
version of lcc compaires with Gcc version 2.4.5?
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.