Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | Lutz Prechelt <prechelt@ira.uka.de> |
Keywords: | interpreter |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 93-08-116 |
Date: | Mon, 30 Aug 1993 08:23:28 GMT |
> > I would say that every language which is (almost?) ALWAYS
> > interpreted instead of compiled can be called a scripting language.
>
>
> Err, I suspect some of the Worshippers of APL would be very surprised
> to hear their religion besmirched as a mere 'scripting language'. :)
This is only a question of connotation.
You seem to treat 'scripting language' as having negative connotation as
far as 'real programs' are concerned.
But isn't it great that a language (such as APL) may allow you to solve
your problems by merely writing a script instead of a program ? :-)
This thought really contains a bit of truth: Often languages are interpreted
just because they are so very powerful (and thus difficult to compile; APL is
a good example).
Lutz
Lutz Prechelt (email: prechelt@ira.uka.de)
Institut fuer Programmstrukturen und Datenorganisation
Universitaet Karlsruhe; 76128 Karlsruhe; Germany
(Voice: ++49/721/608-4068, FAX: ++49/721/694092)
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.