Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| incremental compilation via shared library dave@yost.com (1993-08-25) |
| Re: incremental compilation via shared library cliffc@rice.edu (1993-08-29) |
| incremental compilation via shared library brent@jade.ssd.csd.harris.com (1993-08-30) |
| Re: incremental compilation via shared library pardo@cs.washington.edu (1993-09-02) |
| Re: incremental compilation via shared library assmann@prosun.first.gmd.de (1993-09-03) |
| Re: incremental compilation via shared library brett@digits.enet.dec.com (1993-09-07) |
| Re: incremental compilation via shared library pop@dcs.gla.ac.uk (pop) (1993-09-07) |
| Re: incremental compilation via shared library pcg@decb.aber.ac.uk (1993-09-11) |
| [5 later articles] |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,gnu.misc.discuss,comp.lang.c,comp.object |
| From: | cliffc@rice.edu (Cliff Click) |
| Keywords: | design, smalltalk |
| Organization: | Center for Research on Parallel Computations |
| References: | 93-08-104 |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Aug 1993 20:25:08 GMT |
dave@yost.com (Dave Yost) writes:
> I don't travel these parts often, but I've been wondering...
> Isn't it time compilation became as easy as making a subroutine call?
> I think it would be great if there were shared libraries that
> offered incremental compilation services. You would call a
> service function and pass it a code object, which includes slots
> ...
> Compilation could become more ubiquitous and more interactive.
> --
> Dave Yost
Have you looked at Smalltalk or Self?
Also many PC programming tools like QuickBasic, QuickC,
TurboC, etc support environments that look remarkably
like incremental compilers.
Cliff
--
cliffc@cs.rice.edu -- Massively Scalar Compiler Group
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.