Related articles |
---|
Interpreting C++ D.J.Tallis@cen.exeter.ac.uk (1993-03-23) |
Re: Interpreting C++ hlf@nic.cerf.net (1993-03-25) |
Re: Interpreting C++ mehrotra@csrd.uiuc.edu (1993-03-29) |
Re: Learning about Graph Coloring paper mueller@delta.cs.fsu.edu (1993-03-29) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,comp.lang.c++ |
From: | mehrotra@csrd.uiuc.edu (Sharad Mehrotra) |
Keywords: | C++, debug, question |
Organization: | University of Illinois, Center for Supercomputing R&D |
Date: | Mon, 29 Mar 1993 04:42:15 GMT |
The moderator writes:
>
> [ObjectCenter is indeed well-regarded, but it's not cheap. People who use
> it say it's well worth its price for the debugging help it provides. -John]
>
To which I have a follow up question:
Has anyone compared HP C++ Softbench, Centerline ObjectCenter, Lucid
Energize, ParcPlace Systems ObjectWorks, and SunPro SPARCworks
Professional C++, on a feature-by-feature basis? All of these are
basically C++ development environments, but I would like to hear if
people have a clear favorite.
Thanks.
Sharad Mehrotra
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.