Related articles |
---|
Practicality of functional and logic languages? benes@dcse.fee.vutbr.cs (Mirek Benes) (1993-01-11) |
Re: Practicality of functional and logic languages? eifrig@beanworld.cs.jhu.edu (1993-01-12) |
Re: Practicality of functional and logic languages? tobbe@erix.ericsson.se (1993-01-12) |
Re: Practicality of functional and logic languages? maniattb@cs.rpi.edu (1993-01-12) |
Re: Practicality of functional and logic languages? torbenm@diku.dk (1993-01-13) |
Re: Practicality of functional and logic languages? hdev@dutiai.twi.tudelft.nl (1993-01-13) |
re: Practicality of functional and logic languages? ludemann@quintus.com (Peter Ludemann) (1993-01-13) |
[9 later articles] |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | Mirek Benes <benes@dcse.fee.vutbr.cs> |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Date: | Mon, 11 Jan 1993 06:33:16 GMT |
Keywords: | functional, design |
I would like to know some opinions concerning functional and logic
programming languages (Haskell, Miranda, ML / Prolog) and their practical
usability for programming:
* Are they (1) toys for playful programmers, (2) something usable only
at universities for never-ending research, or (3) important means for
development of usable software products?
* Are there any (comercially?) successful applications written in functional
or logic languages?
* How effective these applications are comparing with applications
written in classic procedural languages like Pascal?
I want to start courses of these programming styles at the university,
so any opinions on the subject will clear up my situation.
Miroslav Benes
--
Technical University of Brno E-mail: benes@dcse.fee.vutbr.cs
Faculty of Electrical Engineering Phone: +42-5-746111 / 238
Department of Computer Science & Engineering
Bozetechova 2, CS-612 66 Brno FAX: +42-5-750252
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.