Related articles |
---|
Code quality drw@zermelo.mit.edu (1993-01-06) |
Re: Code quality preston@dawn.cs.rice.edu (1993-01-06) |
Re: Code quality davidm@questor.rational.com (1993-01-06) |
Re: Code quality henry@zoo.toronto.edu (1993-01-06) |
Re: Code quality tchannon@black.demon.co.uk (1993-01-07) |
Re: Code quality prener@watson.ibm.com (1993-01-07) |
Re: Code quality ssimmons@convex.com (1993-01-07) |
Re: Code quality bill@amber.csd.harris.com (1993-01-07) |
Re: Code quality tm@netcom.com (1993-01-07) |
Re: Code quality grover@brahmand.Eng.Sun.COM (1993-01-07) |
Re: Code quality drw@riesz.mit.edu (1993-01-08) |
Re: Code quality polstra!jdp@uunet.UU.NET (1993-01-12) |
Re: Code quality shebs@apple.com (1993-01-13) |
[2 later articles] |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | ssimmons@convex.com (Steve Simmons) |
Organization: | Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA |
Date: | Thu, 7 Jan 1993 13:48:15 GMT |
Keywords: | optimize |
References: | 93-01-017 |
>Is there much of a market for another 10% in speed of generated code?
If the application takes 10 days to run, then taking a 10% off the
application time saves you an entire day's worth of work (and risk
of down time). It is all relative.
Thank you.
Steve Simmons
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.