Related articles |
---|
[10 earlier articles] |
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ tmb@idiap.ch (1992-08-17) |
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ hudson@cs.umass.edu (1992-08-17) |
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (1992-08-18) |
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ tmb@arolla.idiap.ch (1992-08-18) |
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ tmb@arolla.idiap.ch (1992-08-19) |
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ maxtal@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (1992-08-20) |
Re: Adding garbage collection to C++ fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (1992-08-21) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus James HENDERSON) |
Organization: | Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia |
Date: | Fri, 21 Aug 1992 07:22:25 GMT |
Followup-To: | comp.lang.c++ |
References: | 92-08-052 92-08-112 |
Keywords: | C++, GC, design, comment |
tmb@arolla.idiap.ch (Thomas M. Breuel) writes:
>As I said before, I don't advocate this scheme. It's a cute solution to an
>interesting puzzle, nothing more.
Ah, yes, but I was disputing whether you had solved the puzzle! :-)
I would certainly agree that the question is purely academic.
To be fair, however, I think that the puzzle should include at least
the following rules: any solution must
- work for any strictly conforming program;
- allow separate compilation;
- not cause memory leaks.
Unfortunately including these conditions makes the puzzle unsolveable, IMHO :-(.
(We seem to have strayed away from serious compiler buisiness.
Follow-ups to comp.lang.c++).
--
Fergus Henderson fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU
[Enough already of this discussion, it's getting mired in details. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.