Re: Operator precedence and Recursive Descent

man@labrea.zko.dec.com (Richard Man)
Tue, 26 May 1992 15:43:16 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
LL vs LR, no jihad initiation, but... parrt@ecn.purdue.edu (1992-05-11)
Operator precedence and Recursive Descent stt@inmet.com (1992-05-22)
Re: Operator precedence and Recursive Descent graham@maths.su.oz.au (1992-05-23)
Re: Operator precedence and Recursive Descent man@labrea.zko.dec.com (1992-05-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: man@labrea.zko.dec.com (Richard Man)
Keywords: LL(1), parse
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
References: 92-05-059 92-05-130
Date: Tue, 26 May 1992 15:43:16 GMT

graham@maths.su.oz.au (Graham Matthews) writes:
> I once wrote a one routine expression parser. ... I had a table of
> operator precedences. The routine built a parse tree by re-ordering the
> parse tree if the just seen operator was of higher precedence than (I
> think) the root of the existing parse tree.


The Whitesmiths C compilers use something very similar. The original
routine was originally coded in Asm (I think) back in the 70's. Sort of as
"how compact I can write this routine" kind of contest. The C version of
the tree rewriting routine is only about 6 lines or so, a conditional
recursive call embedded in a for loop. Many times I have wished for
comments though ;-).


--
- Richard F. Man (man@labrea.zko.dec.com)
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.