Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ?

dalamb@qucis.queensu.ca (David Lamb)
Wed, 13 May 1992 11:30:09 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? martin@CS.UCLA.EDU (1992-04-30)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? macrakis@osf.org (1992-05-05)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? martin@CS.UCLA.EDU (1992-05-07)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? sdm@cs.brown.edu (1992-05-08)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? root@grok19.columbiasc.NCR.COM (Dave Howell) (1992-05-11)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? dalamb@qucis.queensu.ca (1992-05-13)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? rascal@verdix.com (1992-05-14)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? bevan@computer-science.manchester.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) (1992-05-15)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? macrakis@osf.org (1992-05-15)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? mjordan@src.dec.com (1992-05-15)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? bevan@computer-science.manchester.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) (1992-05-16)
Re: standard intermediate representation for C/C++ ? kendall@centerline.com (1992-05-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: dalamb@qucis.queensu.ca (David Lamb)
Keywords: C, tools
Organization: Computing & Information Science, Queen's University at Kingston
References: 92-05-065
Date: Wed, 13 May 1992 11:30:09 GMT

>From the lack of responses to the request for a 'high-level' intermediate
representation for C/C++: Do y'all believe a "DIANA-like" representation
would be useful if someone were to develop it? My general impression was
that DIANA had succeeded only insofar as people thought they were forced
to use it by the DoD [kinda depressing for us DIANA designers]
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.