Related articles |
---|
Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? tfj@cix.compulink.co.uk (Trevor Jenkins) (1992-04-20) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? nickh@CS.CMU.EDU (1992-04-21) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? preston@dawn.cs.rice.edu (1992-04-22) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? geoff@world.std.com (1992-04-22) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (1992-04-23) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? jrbd@craycos.com (1992-04-23) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? drw@nevanlinna.mit.edu (1992-04-24) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? md@sco.COM (1992-04-27) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? ejp@bohra.cpg.oz.au (1992-04-27) |
Re: Why is Cobol ignored in compiler textbooks? meissner@osf.org (1992-04-28) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams) |
Keywords: | Cobol |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 92-04-100 |
Date: | Thu, 23 Apr 1992 13:57:23 GMT |
One stupid programmer trick worth trying once is to pass a COBOL
program into a style&grammar checker. Then you realize that COBOL
really is close to English -- just a very stilted English, with
excessive use of the passive voice.
--
Kent Williams, williams@cs.uiowa.edu
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.