Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type"

pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Wed, 26 Feb 92 10:48:55 EST

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[5 earlier articles]
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" eric@tfs.COM (1992-02-22)
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" spot@CS.CMU.EDU (1992-02-24)
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" pardo@cs.washington.edu (1992-02-24)
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" glew@pdx007.intel.com (1992-02-25)
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" scott@cs.rochester.edu (1992-02-25)
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" rjbodkin@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ronald Bodkin) (1992-02-25)
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" pmetzger@shearson.com (1992-02-26)
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" gaal@thesee.inria.fr (1992-03-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Keywords: types
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 92-02-085 92-02-114
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 92 10:48:55 EST

      scott@cs.rochester.edu (Michael Scott) writes:


      Maybe, maybe not. A library C compiler (especially a simple,
      not-very-optimizing one) need not be all that expensive. You might want
      to check out Henry Massalin's Synthesis operating system; it creates and
      compiles customized pieces of itself on the fly, in order to improve
      performance.


Synthesis didn't originally include a C compiler to do its on-the-fly
internal code generation, although Henry did contemplate eventual use of a
high level language for specifying such things. He may have changed things
recently, though; however, I still doubt he would bother with compiling on
the fly; its not Henry's style to bog things down; he goes for raw speed.


Perry Metzger
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.