Related articles |
---|
[5 earlier articles] |
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" eric@tfs.COM (1992-02-22) |
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" spot@CS.CMU.EDU (1992-02-24) |
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" pardo@cs.washington.edu (1992-02-24) |
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" glew@pdx007.intel.com (1992-02-25) |
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" scott@cs.rochester.edu (1992-02-25) |
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" rjbodkin@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ronald Bodkin) (1992-02-25) |
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" pmetzger@shearson.com (1992-02-26) |
Re: Reference to "First-Class Data Type" gaal@thesee.inria.fr (1992-03-03) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger) |
Keywords: | types |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 92-02-085 92-02-114 |
Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 92 10:48:55 EST |
scott@cs.rochester.edu (Michael Scott) writes:
Maybe, maybe not. A library C compiler (especially a simple,
not-very-optimizing one) need not be all that expensive. You might want
to check out Henry Massalin's Synthesis operating system; it creates and
compiles customized pieces of itself on the fly, in order to improve
performance.
Synthesis didn't originally include a C compiler to do its on-the-fly
internal code generation, although Henry did contemplate eventual use of a
high level language for specifying such things. He may have changed things
recently, though; however, I still doubt he would bother with compiling on
the fly; its not Henry's style to bog things down; he goes for raw speed.
Perry Metzger
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.