Incremental compilation

whatis@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Steve Boswell)
23 Jan 92 08:19:49 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Incremental compilation whatis@gnu.ai.mit.edu (1992-01-23)
Re: Incremental compilation preston@dawn.cs.rice.edu (1992-01-23)
Re: Incremental compilation wright@gefion.cs.rice.edu (1992-01-23)
Re: Incremental compilation ltd@netcom.netcom.com (1992-01-24)
Incremental Compilation shure@sd.co.il (Alexander Rozenman) (1999-11-02)
Re: Incremental Compilation xenophon@irtnog.org (Matthew Economou) (1999-11-03)
Re: Incremental Compilation maratb@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Marat Boshernitsan) (1999-11-05)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: whatis@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Steve Boswell)
Keywords: code, interpreter
Organization: Free Software Foundation
Date: 23 Jan 92 08:19:49 GMT

I'm looking for references, information, etc. on incremental compilation.
I don't mean makefiles -- the unit of compilation there is the file, and I
wanted something smaller, like the lexical token.


Here's a technique I was planning to try in a compiler. It would save the
entire token stream, syntax tree, semantic information, etc. for a
particular source file compilation. When the source file is modified and
recompiled, it would make a new token stream, do a token-wise diff on the
old and new streams, redo only the syntactic units that it had to, then
recheck semantics recursively.


Has anything like this been done/thought of/etc.? Doing this in my own
project is a long way off, but I was wondering if the time it took to do
the token-wise diff was longer than the time it would take to re-parse the
entire file.


Steve Boswell
whatis@ucsd.edu
whatis@gnu.ai.mit.edu
[It's been done a lot in systems with built-in editors, since the editor
can easily mark what's been changed. -John]
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.