Re: Lookahead vs. Scanner Feedback [erratum]

Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell <rockwell@socrates.umd.edu>
Sat, 4 Jan 92 22:14:48 est

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Lookahead vs. Scanner Feedback hjelm+@cs.cmu.edu (1992-01-03)
Re: Lookahead vs. Scanner Feedback rockwell@socrates.umd.edu (Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell) (1992-01-04)
Re: Lookahead vs. Scanner Feedback [erratum] rockwell@socrates.umd.edu (Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell) (1992-01-04)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell <rockwell@socrates.umd.edu>
Keywords: C, parse
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 92-01-012 92-01-015
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 92 22:14:48 est

I wrote:
      [after a sample production intended to recognize new "typedef
      names".]
      After being hit by the above production, that specific identifier
      will be recognized by LEX as an identifier.
                                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^
That should read: After being hit by the above production, that
specific alphanumeric token will be recognized as a typedef name.
                                                                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^
My apologies. I hope I didn't confuse anyone.
--
Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell <rockwell@socrates.umd.edu>
[Sorry, I should have caught that. -John]
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.