Related articles |
---|
What's wrong with alloca() ? preston@dawn.cs.rice.edu (1991-12-19) |
Re: What's wrong with alloca() ? wws@renaissance.cray.com (1991-12-30) |
Re: What's wrong with alloca() in gcc???? mo@gizmo.bellcore.com (1991-12-31) |
Re: What's wrong with alloca() in gcc???? ted@nmsu.edu (1991-12-31) |
Re: What's wrong with alloca() in gcc???? angular!jas@Sun.COM (1992-01-01) |
Re: What's wrong with alloca() in gcc???? tarjeij@ulrik.uio.no (1992-01-02) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | mo@gizmo.bellcore.com (Michael O'Dell) |
Keywords: | storage |
Organization: | Center for Chaotic Repeatabilty |
References: | 91-12-075 91-12-089 |
Date: | Tue, 31 Dec 91 11:52:03 GMT |
At least at one time, the dynamic array stuff in gcc was very broken
in that if you have
int foo[z];
sizeof(foo) returned sizeof(int). This is so wrong as to be beyond
belief. Yes, it is hard to make it work right, but then, that's why
one should think hard about putting in such "features".
-Mike O'Dell
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.