Re: Current work in compiler/language design.

pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
Thu, 21 Nov 91 20:42:13 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. carlton@husc8.harvard.edu (1991-11-19)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. chambers@cs.washington.edu (1991-11-18)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. sverker@sics.se (1991-11-19)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. ea08+@andrew.cmu.edu (Eric A. Anderson) (1991-11-19)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. objsys@netcom.com (1991-11-20)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. nick@dcs.edinburgh.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) (1991-11-21)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. pardo@cs.washington.edu (1991-11-21)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. hasan@emx.utexas.edu (1991-11-21)
Current work in compiler/language design. optima!cjeffery@cs.arizona.edu (1991-11-22)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. objsys@netcom.com (1991-11-25)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. preston@dawn.cs.rice.edu (1991-11-26)
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. David.Chase@Eng.Sun.COM (1991-11-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
Keywords: OOP
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
References: 91-11-030 91-11-092
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 91 20:42:13 GMT

Nick Rothwell <nick@dcs.edinburgh.ac.uk> writes:
>[You cannot get every feature just by adding it to the OO paradigm.]


To digress completely, `Object-Oriented' is one particular way of
looking at object-based systems. Things are different in e.g.,
classless object-based languages. For a good discussion see:


%A Peter Wegner
%T Dimensions of Object-Based Language Design
%J OOPSLA '87
%D October 1987
%P 168-182


;-D oN ( Still trying to integrate in type calculus ) Pardo
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.