Related articles |
---|
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. sverker@sics.se (1991-11-19) |
Just how fast is LISP? pschmidt@convex.com (1991-11-20) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? schwartz@roke.cs.psu.edu (1991-11-20) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? barmar@think.com (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? ressler@cs.cornell.edu (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? tmb@ai.mit.edu (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? rockwell@socrates.umd.edu (Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell) (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? hdev@ph.tn.tudelft.nl (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? simonm@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Simon Marlow) (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? barmar@think.com (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? ram+@cs.cmu.edu (1991-11-23) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? varghese@cs.MENTORG.COM (1991-11-25) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell <rockwell@socrates.umd.edu> |
Keywords: | Lisp, performance |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 91-11-072 91-11-080 |
Date: | Thu, 21 Nov 91 01:30:38 est |
Perry Schmidt:
**Note: I can't find the source for the quote, but I remember
reading some AI book claiming that LISP is as fast or faster than
traditional prog. langs. in math intensive programs.
I used to have an MIT-LCS Tech Report talking about a MACLISP compiler
which would generate the same code for numeric applications as a
FORTRAN compiler. Of course, you did have to do FORTRAN-like things
(declare floating point variables, for instance).
While one may argue about the value of this approach, it is certainly
true that identical object code will run the same speed, no matter
what the source language.
--
Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell
<rockwell@socrates.umd.edu>
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.