Related articles |
---|
Re: Current work in compiler/language design. sverker@sics.se (1991-11-19) |
Just how fast is LISP? pschmidt@convex.com (1991-11-20) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? schwartz@roke.cs.psu.edu (1991-11-20) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? barmar@think.com (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? ressler@cs.cornell.edu (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? tmb@ai.mit.edu (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? rockwell@socrates.umd.edu (Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell) (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? hdev@ph.tn.tudelft.nl (1991-11-21) |
Re: Just how fast is LISP? simonm@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Simon Marlow) (1991-11-21) |
[3 later articles] |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | schwartz@roke.cs.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz) |
Keywords: | Lisp, performance |
Organization: | penn state university, computer science |
References: | 91-11-072 91-11-080 |
Date: | Wed, 20 Nov 1991 19:03:03 -0500 |
pschmidt@convex.com (Perry Schmidt) writes:
| Question: As I said, I've seen many claims about LISP being as fast as C.
| Got any proof?
A trivial example where T3.1 is faster than C on a Sun Sparc is
Ackerman's function. T doesn't use the same calling conventions as C,
and avoids a huge hit from flushing the register windows all the time.
More generally, C is about twice as fast as T, at least according to
the small benchmarks that get usually published.
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.