Related articles |
---|
When is a typedef name not a typedef name? jwl@sag4.ssl.berkeley.edu (1991-07-09) |
Re: When is a typedef name not a typedef name? henry@zoo.toronto.edu (1991-07-20) |
Re: When is a typedef name not a typedef name? mengel@fnal.fnal.gov (1991-07-31) |
Newsgroups: | comp.lang.c,comp.compilers |
From: | henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) |
Keywords: | C |
Organization: | U of Toronto Zoology |
References: | 91-07-032 |
Date: | Sat, 20 Jul 1991 23:36:18 GMT |
In article 91-07-032 jwl@sag4.ssl.berkeley.edu (Jim Lewis) writes:
>It turns out that the "foo foo;" declaration is only legal inside a
>struct or union ...
Persons considering replying to this should note that it was also posted
independently to one of the C groups a while ago, and got considerable
discussion there. (For example, the above-quoted statement is wrong.)
--
Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology, henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.