Related articles |
---|
Strings derivable from a grammar pg@bsg.com (1991-04-24) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | pg@bsg.com (Peter Garst) |
Keywords: | yacc, parse, testing |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | <1991Apr23.140427.5416@iecc.cambridge.ma.us> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Apr 91 08:34:52 PDT |
Ed King asks about generating strings described by a grammar.
Our grammar tool, ydb, does this, using approximately the following
method:
For each rule and symbol in the grammar, keep track length of the
shortest derivable string. It is 1 for terminals; then you can do all rules
with only terminals on the right hand side; and so on. Just keep going
through the grammar until each one is labeled with a length. (If there
are unlabeled items and you can't get any more, they don't derive
terminal strings).
Then for any nonterminal it's a simple matter to get some derived strings.
For any rule defining the nonterminal, for each nonterminal on the
right hand side of the rule, you can pick a rule which you know will
lead to a terminal string eventually. This method leads to shortest
derivable strings.
If you want to generate lots of strings for a symbol, a search algorithm
using a stack of partial derivations would be appropriate.
We've found this idea to be very useful for debugging grammars; when
you have a grammar with problems it's handy to check if the rules
really describe what you think they do.
Peter Garst
pg@bsg.com
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.