Related articles |
---|
YACC, going the other way elk@cblpn.att.com (1991-04-15) |
Re: YACC, going the other way zeil@cs.odu.edu (1991-04-23) |
Re: YACC, going the other way carlton@aldebaran.Berkeley.EDU (1991-04-23) |
Re: YACC, going the other way wunder@hpsdel.sde.hp.com (Walter Underwood) (1991-04-24) |
Re: YACC, going the other way zvr@ntua.gr (1991-04-25) |
Re: YACC, going the other way jimad@microsoft.UUCP (1991-04-26) |
Re: YACC, going the other way ressler@cs.cornell.edu (1991-05-01) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | zeil@cs.odu.edu (Steven J. Zeil) |
Keywords: | yacc, testing |
Organization: | Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA |
References: | <1991Apr23.140427.5416@iecc.cambridge.ma.us> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 91 16:33:53 GMT |
In article <1991Apr23.140427.5416@iecc.cambridge.ma.us> elk@cblpn.att.com (Edwin Lewis King +1 614 860 3394) writes:
>I'm interesting in generating strings that are described by a BNF (OK,
>YACC) grammar.
I have seen references to this as a means of describing and generating
test data. This method can be applied to many programs with heavily
structured input data, including programs that are not themselves
compilers/translators.
A reference that comes to mind is Duncan & Hutchison, "Using Atributed
Grammars to Test Designs and Implementations", in the 5th International
Conference on Software Engineering.
Steve Z
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.