Related articles |
---|
Cost/Benefit of compiler optimization techniques? baxter@zola.ICS.UCI.EDU (Ira Baxter) (1990-11-28) |
Re: Cost/Benefit of compiler optimization techniques? turpin@cs.utexas.edu (1990-11-28) |
Re: Cost/Benefit of compiler optimization techniques? norvell@csri.toronto.edu (1990-11-28) |
Re: Cost/Benefit of compiler optimization techniques? victor@vivaldi.csc.ti.com (1990-11-29) |
Re: Cost/Benefit of compiler optimization techniques? preston@ariel.rice.edu (1990-11-29) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | norvell@csri.toronto.edu (Theo Norvell) |
Keywords: | optimize, design |
Organization: | CSRI, University of Toronto |
References: | <9011280511.aa16546@ICS.UCI.EDU> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Nov 90 22:47:18 EST |
In article <9011280511.aa16546@ICS.UCI.EDU> Ira Baxter <baxter@zola.ICS.UCI.EDU> writes:
>I am interested in finding out the "most useful" optimizations ... by
>comparing average quantitative payoffs which rank them ... to some
>measure of the average effort to implement that optimization ...
>Additional useful information would be something like conditional utility,
>i.e., if technique A is used, then technique B is X% less useful.
^^^^ (or more!)
An ought-to-be classic work on just this question is Fredrick Chow's thesis,
done under John Henessey:
Author: F.C. Chow
Title: A Portable Machine-independent Global Optimizer - Design and
Measurements
Report: CSL T.R. 83-254
Publisher: Computer Systems Laboratory, Stanford University
Availability: cost: $8.25
Theo Norvell
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.