Related articles |
---|
Multi-compilers -- The ``Ideal'' Programming language ?? md89mch@cc.brunel.ac.uk (1990-09-25) |
Re: Multi-compilers -- The ``Ideal'' Programming language ?? pardo@cs.washington.edu (1990-09-30) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) |
Keywords: | design, Lisp |
Organization: | University of Washington, Computer Science, Seattle |
References: | <9009110403.AA03158@csd4.csd.uwm.edu> <1990Sep25.025517.25446@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <6618@uwm.edu> |
Date: | 30 Sep 90 16:19:26 GMT |
markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
>[Prolog allows for user-definable syntax to sme degree]
So do (did) many LISPs, where it was possible to redefine the
read-eval-print loop to use Your Favorite Syntax.
;-D on ( No taxing those sins! ) Prado
--
pardo@cs.washington.edu
{rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.