Compilers 2000

Jeff Prothero <jsp@milton.u.washington.edu>
Fri, 28 Sep 90 18:05:35 -0700

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Compilers 2000 jsp@milton.u.washington.edu (Jeff Prothero) (1990-09-28)
Re: Compilers 2000 preston@titan.rice.edu (1990-10-02)
Re: Compilers 2000 rfg@ncd.com (1990-10-06)
Re: Compilers 2000 stt@inmet.inmet.com (1990-10-07)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: Jeff Prothero <jsp@milton.u.washington.edu>
Keywords: design
Organization: Compilers Central
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 90 18:05:35 -0700

comp.arch has no shortage of prognostications as to what is Right and Wrong
with hardware today, and what hardware will be like in ten or twenty years.
Anyone (John? Preston? Peter? ...) want to offer comments on what is Right
and Wrong with the compiler field today, and what compilers will look like
ten or twenty years from now?


Possible threads:


Problems posed by coming architectures.


Opportunities posed by coming architectures..


How mature are the theoretical foundations of the compiler field?


Will compiler papers ever reference computer algebra papers?


Can declarative languages ever displace imperative ones? Should they? Does
this primarily depend on the presence / absence of needed compiler
technology?


  - Jeff Prothero (jsp@milton.u.washington.edu)
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.