Related articles |
---|
Parallel FORTRAN bite pardo@june.cs.washington.edu (1990-05-30) |
Re: Parallel FORTRAN bite sampson@cod.nosc.mil (1990-06-11) |
Re: Parallel FORTRAN bite hirchert@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (1990-06-12) |
Parallel Fortran bite worley@compass.com (1990-06-20) |
From: | pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) |
Newsgroups: | comp.lang.misc,comp.compilers,alt.flame |
Date: | 30 May 90 19:34:27 GMT |
From: | pardo@june.cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) |
Organization: | University of Washington, Computer Science, Seattle |
One of my friends was trying to write a program to run on a Connection
Machine. He used the construct
DOALL I = 1, N
and the program RAN, but it gave wrong answers. He eventually
discovered that CM FORTRAN doesn't have the DOALL extension, and that
the compiler was dutifully converting his code to
DO ALLI = 1, N
Thank god he wasn't writing code for the Range Safety Officer on the
next shuttle launch!
;-D on ( DAIIC: Do As If I'm Crazy ) Pardo
--
pardo@cs.washington.edu
{rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.