Related articles |
---|
Need input on designing a new language ramsey@ncoast.ORG (1990-05-26) |
Re: Need input on designing a new language henry@zoo.toronto.edu (1990-06-01) |
Re: Need input on designing a new language klefstad@opera.ICS.UCI.EDU (Ray Klefstad II) (1990-06-04) |
Re: Need input on designing a new language henry@zoo.toronto.edu (1990-06-04) |
Re: Need input on designing a new language praxis!itcp@relay.EU.net (Tom Parke) (1990-06-06) |
Date: | Sat, 26 May 90 20:06:11 EDT |
From: | ramsey@ncoast.ORG (Cedric Ramsey) |
I have a question to pose to you programmers. I am thinking about
developing a new language but first I would you all's input a problem that
I have. Firstly, I must say that the main goal of many languages should be
simplicty. Simple to solve problems with and simple to implement on a compiler.
Thats the heart of my problem, simple to implement. It would be easier for
me if I forced the user, programmer, to declare all the procedures before the
function body occurs. That is;
Declare Procedure A
... Local and Global variables ...
End Declare
Declare Procedure B
... Local and Global variables ...
End Declare
.
.
.
Declare Procedure X
... Local and Global variables ...
End Declare
Body for procedure A
End Body
Body for procedure B
End Body
.
.
.
Body for procedure X
End Body
Else I could allow the C flavor declarations, that is;
Declare procedure A
... Local GLobals ...
End Declare
Body for procedure A
End body
If you programmers think that this is a good or bad idea, that is, force
programmer to declare all procedures before usage, please send me your
pro and/or cons against or for it. After all, the language will be for you
guys so I feel it necessary for you guys to give me guide lines in creating
a heafty language. please leave replys via E-mail: ramsey@ncoast.ORG ,
thank you for your time and considerations.
[What's a heafty language? -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.