Re: Compilers and RISC (was: '040 vs. SPARC)

pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
9 Feb 90 20:13:37 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Compilers and RISC (was: '040 vs. SPARC) Moss@cs.umass.edu (1990-02-09)
Re: Compilers and RISC (was: '040 vs. SPARC) pardo@cs.washington.edu (1990-02-09)
Re: Compilers and RISC (was: '040 vs. SPARC) dgb@cs.washington.edu (1990-02-10)
Re: Compilers and RISC (was: '040 vs. SPARC) pardo@june.cs.washington.edu (1990-02-11)
Re: Compilers and RISC (was: '040 vs. SPARC) colwell@multiflow.com (1990-02-12)
Re: Compilers and RISC (was: '040 vs. SPARC) dgb@cs.washington.edu (1990-02-12)
Re: Compilers and RISC (was: '040 vs. SPARC) glass@qtc.uucp (David N. Glass) (1990-02-14)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 9 Feb 90 20:13:37 GMT
References: <8905@portia.Stanford.EDU> <160@zds-ux.UUCP> <38415@apple.Apple.COM> <2101@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <19233@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1990Feb9.161153.4190@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us>
Organization: University of Washington, Computer Science, Seattle

Moss@cs.umass.edu writes:
>[`Global' (procedural) vs. interprocedural optimizations]


Er, a big bite of mine for a long time.
Can we change the terminology, please?


* Local optimization: within a basic block.
* Procedural optimization: over the whole procedure.
* Interprocedural: obvious.
* Global optimziation: whole program.
* Interdomain: among programs.


Well, I just had to get it off my chest.


;-D on ( Soul of a new speak ) Pardo
--
pardo@cs.washington.edu
        {rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo




Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.