Re: advice needed re: parsing C decl syntax

Steve Vegdahl <ihnp4!tektronix!tekchips.TEK.COM!stevev>
09 Dec 86 09:12:14 PST (Tue)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
advice needed re: parsing C decl syntax toronto.edu!tarvydas@csri (Paul Tarvydas) (1986-12-06)
Re: advice needed re: parsing C decl syntax harvard!rutgers!seismo!rochester!ken (SKY) (1986-12-08)
Re: advice needed re: parsing C decl syntax ihnp4!tektronix!tekchips.TEK.COM!stevev (Steve Vegdahl) (1986-12-09)
Re: advice needed re: parsing C decl syntax ihnp4!bobkat!pedz (Pedz Thing) (1986-12-10)
Re: advice needed re: parsing C decl syntax steve@basser.oz (1986-12-10)
Re: advice needed re: parsing C decl syntax ihnp4!utzoo!henry (1986-12-16)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: mod.compilers
Cc: (Paul Tarvydas) csri!toronto.edu!tarvydas
Date: 09 Dec 86 09:12:14 PST (Tue)
From: Steve Vegdahl <ihnp4!tektronix!tekchips.TEK.COM!stevev>

Paul Tarvydas writes:
>I'm still reluctant to use a straight LALR table parser for reasons of
>(ahem) efficiency. Things like expressions & statements are wonderful
>candidates for recursive-descent.
> ...
>Has anybody successfully married LR parsing with recursive-descent
>techniques? Are there any other clean tricks/techniques I could use?


At the most recent Compiler Construction Conference (SigPlan notices,
July 1986), Thomas Pennello presented a technique for "compiling" the
parse-tables directly into (assembly) code, which apparently speeds up
the parsing process by a factor of 6-10.


>[But I really don't see the point. Yacc certainly has its problems, but
>excessively slow parsing has never seemed to be one of them. -John]


In his conclusions, Pennello also echoes this opinion:
        "Trying to speed up an LR parser may seem like beating as dead
        horse, since LR parsers are already reasonably fast."


Still, I think the paper is worth reading.


Steve Vegdahl
Computer Research Lab
Tektronix Labs
Beaverton, Oregon





Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.