| Related articles |
|---|
| Why should students still study compilers? costello@mitre.org (Roger L Costello) (2026-08-24) |
| Why should students still study compilers? michael.lehn@uni-ulm.de (Michael Lehn) (2026-08-25) |
| Re: Why should students still study compilers? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (2026-08-26) |
| Re: Why should students still study compilers? noreply@example.invalid (bixbox) (2026-08-27) |
| Re: Why should students still study compilers? davide.grandi@email.it (Davide Grandi) (2026-08-29) |
| From: | Davide Grandi <davide.grandi@email.it> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Aug 2026 09:31:18 +0200 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 26-08-004 |
| Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="72283"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords: | courses |
| Posted-Date: | 31 Aug 2026 11:36:51 EDT |
| In-Reply-To: | 26-08-004 |
Hi,
instinctively: because if someone works on software the lifecycle of a
"program", compilers are simply fundamental.
experimentally: it worked for my studies and "career", guiding my choices on
software tools from writing to testing. And, in many cases, for
transforming.
philologically: the fifth book of "The art of computer programming" will be
about scanning and parsing.
culturally: if one knows at least the basics of grammars and syntax (not to
speak about the following phases) that one can face the usually-butcomplex
recurring problems, maybe choosing wisely the right tool
Bye, end of my 0,02 €
Davide
On 24/08/2026 19:44, Roger L Costello wrote:
> For many years, I've regarded compiler construction as one of the most
> scientific, disciplined, and algorithmic areas of computer science. There is
> something wonderfully satisfying about a field in which so much can be derived
> systematically rather than done by the seat of the pants.
>
> The difficulty, at least in my experience, is that there simply aren't that
> many jobs writing compilers. Occasionally I get a small job writing a
> dedicated parser, but for the most part I have little opportunity to use
> compiler algorithms professionally. That makes it hard to justify spending my
> limited time keeping those skills fresh.
>
> And now I wonder whether LLMs will reduce the demand for some kinds of
> compiler and parser expertise even further.
>
> So I'm curious what people on this list think: **Why should a computer science
> student today take a compiler course?**
>
> Do students take compiler courses because the techniques they learn are likely
> to be useful in their careers, despite the relatively small number of jobs
> involving compiler development? Or is the real value of a compiler course that
> it teaches broader ways of thinking about languages, grammars,
> representations, transformations, optimization, and software systems?
>
> And has the arrival of LLMs changed your answer at all?
--
ing. Davide Grandi
email : davide.grandi@email.it
mobile : +39 339 7468 778
linkedin : http://linkedin.com/in/davidegrandi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.