Re: Paper: Magellan: Autonomous Discovery of Novel Compiler Optimization Heuristics with AlphaEvolve

Derek <derek@shape-of-code.com>
Sun, 01 Feb 2026 17:37:42 +0000

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Paper: Magellan: Autonomous Discovery of Novel Compiler Optimization Heuristics with AlphaEvolve johnl@taugh.com (John R Levine) (2026-01-30)
Re: Paper: Magellan: Autonomous Discovery of Novel Compiler Optimization Heuristics with AlphaEvolve derek@shape-of-code.com (Derek) (2026-02-01)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Derek <derek@shape-of-code.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 17:37:42 +0000
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 26-01-006
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="28218"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: optimize
Posted-Date: 01 Feb 2026 21:48:02 EST
In-Reply-To: 26-01-006

John,


A paper with "novel" in the title is a major red flag.


> This Google paper describes an AI approach to invent new compiler
> optimizations.


No they don't. They use an LLM to select the tuning parameters
for a well established optimization, function inlining.


> surpass expert baselines. In LLVM function inlining, Magellan synthesizes
> new heuristics that outperform decades of manual engineering for both
> binary-size reduction and end-to-end performance.


"... the continued Gemini-3-Pro run achieves consistent
positive speedups beyond 0%, ultimately surpassing the hand-
tuned baseline by 0.61%."


Figure 3/4 suggests a much bigger improvement, until the reader
realises that the comparison is not against human generated
rules. Results given to two decimal places and no error bars!


> In register allocation,
> it learns a concise priority rule for live-range processing that matches
> intricate human-designed policies on a large-scale workload.


This sentence in the abstract goes undiscussed in the paper, which
only looks at inlining.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.