| Related articles |
|---|
| Paper: Magellan: Autonomous Discovery of Novel Compiler Optimization Heuristics with AlphaEvolve johnl@taugh.com (John R Levine) (2026-01-30) |
| Re: Paper: Magellan: Autonomous Discovery of Novel Compiler Optimization Heuristics with AlphaEvolve derek@shape-of-code.com (Derek) (2026-02-01) |
| From: | Derek <derek@shape-of-code.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Sun, 01 Feb 2026 17:37:42 +0000 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 26-01-006 |
| Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="28218"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords: | optimize |
| Posted-Date: | 01 Feb 2026 21:48:02 EST |
| In-Reply-To: | 26-01-006 |
John,
A paper with "novel" in the title is a major red flag.
> This Google paper describes an AI approach to invent new compiler
> optimizations.
No they don't. They use an LLM to select the tuning parameters
for a well established optimization, function inlining.
> surpass expert baselines. In LLVM function inlining, Magellan synthesizes
> new heuristics that outperform decades of manual engineering for both
> binary-size reduction and end-to-end performance.
"... the continued Gemini-3-Pro run achieves consistent
positive speedups beyond 0%, ultimately surpassing the hand-
tuned baseline by 0.61%."
Figure 3/4 suggests a much bigger improvement, until the reader
realises that the comparison is not against human generated
rules. Results given to two decimal places and no error bars!
> In register allocation,
> it learns a concise priority rule for live-range processing that matches
> intricate human-designed policies on a large-scale workload.
This sentence in the abstract goes undiscussed in the paper, which
only looks at inlining.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.