Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Which comes first, languages or compilers? gah4@u.washington.edu (gah4) (2023-10-25) |
| Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? 864-117-4973@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2023-10-26) |
| Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? minforth@arcor.de (minf...@arcor.de) (2023-10-27) |
| Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? laguest@archeia.com (Luke A. Guest) (2023-10-27) |
| Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2023-10-30) |
| Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? OrangeFish9737@invalid.invalid (OrangeFish9737) (2023-10-30) |
| Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? laguest@archeia.com (Luke A. Guest) (2023-10-30) |
| Re: Which comes first, languages or compilers? tkoenig@netcologne.de (Thomas Koenig) (2023-11-02) |
| From: | "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@archeia.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Oct 2023 20:35:50 +0000 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 23-10-008 23-10-011 23-10-012 |
| Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="97166"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords: | design, history, comment |
| Posted-Date: | 31 Oct 2023 07:06:06 EDT |
| In-Reply-To: | 23-10-012 |
On 30/10/2023 03:26, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> On 10/27/23 5:57 PM, Luke A. Guest wrote:
>
>> I don't really consider any of Wirth's languages to be designed as
>> they would not have the gaping big holes they have.
>
> The *languages* are all well designed,
That's not what the Oakwood guidelines say.
system *libraries* are incomplete
> or missing.
Yes.
[I'd prefer not to refight 30 year old arguments about language design details here.
At this point Oberon is purely of historical interest and Pascal is close to dead. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.