Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed ivanmtze96@gmail.com (Ivan Espinosa) (2022-10-03) |
| Re: Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl (2022-10-06) |
| Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com (Christopher F Clark) (2022-10-07) |
| Re: Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2022-10-07) |
| Re: Implementing built-in functions with LLVM, help needed antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl (2022-10-13) |
| From: | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Oct 2022 20:59:49 +0200 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 22-10-019 22-10-022 |
| Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="26864"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords: | Pascal, design |
| Posted-Date: | 08 Oct 2022 20:12:04 EDT |
| In-Reply-To: | 22-10-022 |
On 10/7/22 7:56 AM, Christopher F Clark wrote:
> Still, the ability to call functions is the key thing you need to do.
And the compiler has to decide whether an argument type is okay, can be
converted, or is incompatible with a function definition. So IMO
handling of polymorphic and variadic functions is a matter of
organisation of function argument types.
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.