Related articles |
---|
Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser.droog@gmail.com (luser droog) (2022-09-07) |
Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser.droog@gmail.com (luser droog) (2022-09-09) |
Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser.droog@gmail.com (luser droog) (2022-09-11) |
Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com (Christopher F Clark) (2022-09-12) |
Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler gah4@u.washington.edu (gah4) (2022-09-12) |
Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com (Christopher F Clark) (2022-09-13) |
Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler luser.droog@gmail.com (luser droog) (2022-09-14) |
Re: Wrestling with phase 1 of a C compiler gah4@u.washington.edu (gah4) (2022-09-14) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Fri, 9 Sep 2022 20:47:15 -0700 (PDT) |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 22-09-001 |
Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="72888"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | parse, design, comment |
Posted-Date: | 10 Sep 2022 14:36:54 EDT |
In-Reply-To: | 22-09-001 |
On Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 4:01:04 PM UTC-5, luser droog wrote:
> At my tedious glacial pace, I have rewritten my parser library
> for the umpteen-plus-one'th time only to stall out at an earlier
> step than where I stalled out the last time around.
Sorry for the noise. I'm prematurely optimizing, aren't I? The function
that works just fine and is already reasonably short and readable is
just fine for now. Folding and iotas will probably be a fun idea to try --
on the next rewrite. On to possibly important problems....
[It occurred to me that if you want to write in a functional language style,
doing it in C is really painful. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.