Related articles |
---|
Reachability of DFA part borucki.andrzej@gmail.com (Andy) (2019-12-20) |
Re: Reachability of DFA part 493-878-3164@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2019-12-20) |
Re: Reachability of DFA part borucki.andrzej@gmail.com (Andy) (2019-12-21) |
Re: Reachability of DFA part DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2019-12-21) |
Reachability of DFA part christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com (Christopher F Clark) (2019-12-23) |
Re: Reachability of DFA part 493-878-3164@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2019-12-24) |
From: | Kaz Kylheku <493-878-3164@kylheku.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Tue, 24 Dec 2019 04:15:17 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
References: | 19-12-022 |
Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="26242"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | lex |
Posted-Date: | 25 Dec 2019 21:22:24 EST |
On 2019-12-23, Christopher F Clark <christopher.f.clark@compiler-resources.com> wrote:
> Andy borucki.andrzej@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Good definition would be {[^}]*}
>> Complexity of problem increases when comment ends with string
>> len >1, for example C: */ or Pascal *)
>> if we renaming : /->a *->b other->c
>> then bad definition will ab(a|b|b)*ba and good definition is
>> complicated:
>> ab(b|(a|c)*b*)*a (if I not make mistake)
>
>> Commments should maybe be defined in other way, especially
>> comments can be nested in Object Pascal.
>> Comment nesting can using stack or simply counter. I
>> see, in Pascal is using counter.
>> Difference: Pascal has two types of multiline comments { } and (* *)
>
> I'm not sure what kind of language you are trying to lex/parse, but
> the problems you are mentioning all have known solutions.
OP seems to be learning to construct a regex implementation geared
toward the generation of a lexical analyzer for any language.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.