From: | Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:54:18 -0800 (PST) |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 18-05-009 |
Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="15887"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | tools |
Posted-Date: | 19 Dec 2018 15:12:32 EST |
In-Reply-To: | 18-05-009 |
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 18:39:07 UTC+1, Michael Justice wrote:
> Is there any preference to writing a compiler in say c instead of say
> java, fortran, basic etc? ...
> [Mostly people use what they're used to, or in languages that are easy
> to bootstrap on the machines they want to use. IBM's Fortran H
> compiler was famously written in itself, but I wouldn't write a new
> compiler in Fortran because it doesn't have great data structuring or
> dynamic storage management. (Yes, I know that Fortran 2008 is a lot
> different from Fortran 66.) -John]
Pity there are no real compiler-compilers anymore, hint-hint, I am working on one to rule them all ;)
Aaron Gray
---
Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher, Information Theorist, and amateur computer scientist.
[Please don't say you've invented another UNCOL. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.