Re: Compiler implementation language preference ?

Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com>
Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:54:18 -0800 (PST)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[4 earlier articles]
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? rockbrentwood@gmail.com (2018-11-09)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? 157-073-9834@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2018-11-10)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? 157-073-9834@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2018-11-10)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? portempa@aon.at (Richard) (2018-11-10)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2018-11-10)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? ibeam2000@gmail.com (Nick) (2018-11-13)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? aaronngray@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2018-12-19)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu (steve kargl) (2018-12-19)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2018-12-20)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? aaronngray@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2018-12-21)
Re: Compiler implementation language preference ? 157-073-9834@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2018-12-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:54:18 -0800 (PST)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 18-05-009
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="15887"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: tools
Posted-Date: 19 Dec 2018 15:12:32 EST
In-Reply-To: 18-05-009

On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 18:39:07 UTC+1, Michael Justice wrote:
> Is there any preference to writing a compiler in say c instead of say
> java, fortran, basic etc? ...


> [Mostly people use what they're used to, or in languages that are easy
> to bootstrap on the machines they want to use. IBM's Fortran H
> compiler was famously written in itself, but I wouldn't write a new
> compiler in Fortran because it doesn't have great data structuring or
> dynamic storage management. (Yes, I know that Fortran 2008 is a lot
> different from Fortran 66.) -John]


Pity there are no real compiler-compilers anymore, hint-hint, I am working on one to rule them all ;)


Aaron Gray
---
Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher, Information Theorist, and amateur computer scientist.
[Please don't say you've invented another UNCOL. -John]



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.