Related articles |
---|
From: | Kartik Agaram <ak@akkartik.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:27:13 -0700 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | <6effed5e-6c90-f5f4-0c80-a03c61fd2127@gkc.org.uk> 18-03-042 18-03-049 <CANOtCLVc1Rxp4SRSwD+dLXRUSpxY4igGstfcuxxLj-ydekGsjQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="74249"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | Lisp, history |
Posted-Date: | 13 Mar 2018 16:55:29 EDT |
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:09 PM, William Clodius <w.clodius@icloud.com> wrote:
> Didn't Lisp have first order functions and closures in 58? If I remember
> the discussion of APT in the HOPL I conference proceedings correctly it
> surprisingly had the equivalent of structs.
Lisp had first-class functions but closures require lexical scope,
which didn't land until Scheme in the '70s.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.