Related articles |
---|
re2c-1.0 released! skvadrik@gmail.com (Ulya Trofimovich) (2017-08-27) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! 398-816-0742@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2017-09-02) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! 398-816-0742@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2017-09-02) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2017-09-02) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2017-09-02) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! skvadrik@gmail.com (Ulya Trofimovich) (2017-09-03) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! jamin.hanson@googlemail.com (Ben Hanson) (2017-09-03) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! jamin.hanson@googlemail.com (Ben Hanson) (2017-09-03) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! 398-816-0742@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2017-09-03) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! skvadrik@gmail.com (Ulya Trofimovich) (2017-09-03) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! skvadrik@gmail.com (Ulya Trofimovich) (2017-09-03) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! jamin.hanson@googlemail.com (Ben Hanson) (2017-09-04) |
Re: re2c-1.0 released! skvadrik@gmail.com (Ulya Trofimovich) (2017-09-08) |
From: | Ben Hanson <jamin.hanson@googlemail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sun, 3 Sep 2017 03:13:11 -0700 (PDT) |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 17-08-007 17-09-004 |
Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="40066"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | lex |
Posted-Date: | 03 Sep 2017 12:02:20 EDT |
> >As it turns out, submatch extraction is inherently more complex than
> >recognition: it can be solved on NFA, but not on (ordinary) DFA.
>
> I don't know what this means ... every NFA has an equivalent DFA, so
> if a problem can be solved with NFA, it can be solved with DFA.
This is true for regular expressions, but not for capturing regular expressions (irregular expressions?) This is why NFA is traditionally used for regex with captures.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.