Related articles |
---|
XPL Analyzer shoefoot@gmail.com (Shoefoot) (2017-06-05) |
Re: XPL Analyzer robin51@dodo.com.au (Robin Vowels) (2017-06-05) |
Re: XPL Analyzer gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2017-06-05) |
Re: XPL Analyzer shoefoot@gmail.com (Shoefoot) (2017-06-07) |
Re: XPL Analyzer acolvin@efunct.com (mac) (2017-06-08) |
Re: XPL Analyzer slkpg4@gmail.com (SLK Parser Generator) (2017-06-09) |
Re: XPL Analyzer gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2017-06-09) |
[2 later articles] |
From: | Shoefoot <shoefoot@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:48:30 -0400 (EDT) |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Injection-Info: | miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="11057"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | parse, question, comment |
Posted-Date: | 05 Jun 2017 01:48:30 EDT |
I am in the process of writing an XPL compiler. This is the language defined by McKeeman in his
book "A Compiler Generator". While searching the net I have found some references to a version of
the XPL Analyzer that used LALR(1) parse tables. Does anyone have source code for such a program?
[Haven't been able to find it, but of you want LALR tables it shouldn't be hard to
translate the published BNF grammar into a yacc or bison program. If you don't want to use
the bison parser, it's not very hard to pull out the tables from the generated C. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.