Alternatives to Syntax Trees

Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com>
Sun, 15 Jan 2017 16:52:15 -0500 (EST)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Alternatives to Syntax Trees seimarao@gmail.com (Seima Rao) (2017-01-15)
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees 221-501-9011@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2017-01-15)
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2017-01-16)
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees rpw3@rpw3.org (2017-01-16)
Alternatives to Syntax Trees seimarao@gmail.com (Seima Rao) (2017-01-17)
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees 221-501-9011@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2017-01-17)
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2017-01-17)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 16:52:15 -0500 (EST)
Organization: Compilers Central
Injection-Info: miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="97584"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: question, comment
Posted-Date: 15 Jan 2017 16:52:15 EST

Hi,


        Are there alternatives to syntax trees(i.e. the tree data structure)
        when compiling via yacc or yacc like tools ?


Sincerely,
Seima Rao.
[There's quadruples, doubly linked lists of data structures. They
make it easier to rearrange code, but harder to do just about anything
else. There's also DAGs, which are trees that can have shared subtrees,
useful when you're doing common subexpressions or tail merging. -John]

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.