Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux?

arnold@skeeve.com
Thu, 29 Sep 2016 05:30:57 -0600

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[17 earlier articles]
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-27)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rugxulo@gmail.com (2016-09-27)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-28)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-28)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-28)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-29)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-29)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-29)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-29)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2016-09-30)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-30)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-30)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-30)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: arnold@skeeve.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 05:30:57 -0600
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 16-09-001 16-09-033 16-09-034 <b5cdb632-7a67-d577-102d-1a1e23d062f7@gkc.org.uk>
Injection-Info: miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="95651"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: C, practice
Posted-Date: 29 Sep 2016 21:34:58 EDT

> The whole point of "make" is to avoid recompiling things that
> do not need to be recompiled. By repeatedly doing "make distclean"
> you are circumventing this system.
>
> Find out why make is not compiling everything that it needs to.


I am purposely cleaning up the directory so that builds occur from
scratch as I *** switch between branches *** in the git repo. Especially on
the 'stable' and 'master' branches I have to be sure that anyone
checking out those branches will have things work for them.


I am thinking this discussion has gotten out of hand and I apologize
for it. All I'm looking for is a fast compiler for development
since I on purpose do a lot of configure + make from scratch.
I don't care about code quality; just that 'make check' passes.


Since posting, I have repaired tcc to the point where I can use it,
so I'm happy. The PCC issue remains to be resolved; gawk's code changed
(the dfa module from grep) and PCC stopped working. I will eventually
go to the trouble of isolating the problem but it's probably a few
hours' work and that's time I don't have right now.


Thanks to everyone for their replies.


Arnold


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.