Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux?

BartC <bc@freeuk.com>
Mon, 12 Sep 2016 22:37:12 +0100

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? alexfrunews@gmail.com (2016-09-05)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? 221-501-9011@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2016-09-06)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? 221-501-9011@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2016-09-06)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-06)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rockbrentwood@gmail.com (2016-09-07)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-12)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2016-09-12)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-13)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-14)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rugxulo@gmail.com (2016-09-26)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-27)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? rugxulo@gmail.com (2016-09-27)
Re: Alternative C compilers on x86_64 Linux? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2016-09-28)
[13 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: BartC <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 22:37:12 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 16-09-001 16-09-026
Injection-Info: miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="39893"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: C
Posted-Date: 13 Sep 2016 10:49:07 EDT

On 12/09/2016 19:42, Aharon Robbins wrote:


> Privately by someone else, I was suggested to just fix tcc myself.
> It turns out that I was able to add duplicate case checking in about
> an hour's work and just under 100 lines of code. But I have the
> background and experience for that; I suspect someone else would
> have had a harder time.


Do you use TCC to compile itself, or something like gcc?


I'm just interested in whether it partly relies on gcc to get its speed!


--
Bartc



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.