Re: Self compiling compiler

federation2005@netzero.com
Sat, 28 May 2016 14:49:24 -0700 (PDT)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[5 earlier articles]
Re: Self compiling compiler alexfrunews@gmail.com (2016-03-31)
Re: Self compiling compiler jkallup@web.de (Jens Kallup) (2016-03-31)
Re: Self compiling compiler 545-066-4921@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2016-04-03)
Re: Self compiling compiler ershc123@nyc.rr.com (ERSHC) (2016-04-02)
Re: Self compiling compiler nmh@t3x.org (Nils M Holm) (2016-04-04)
Re: Self compiling compiler federation2005@netzero.com (2016-05-25)
Re: Self compiling compiler federation2005@netzero.com (2016-05-28)
Re: Self compiling compiler rockbrentwood@gmail.com (2016-08-22)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: federation2005@netzero.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 14:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 16-03-013 16-05-006
Injection-Info: miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="19316"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: C++, history
Posted-Date: 29 May 2016 21:02:21 EDT

On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 7:07:16 PM UTC-5, federat...@netzero.com wrote:
> If you want to REALLY take this to extreme: use the February 1985 printout
> PDFs http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/c_plus_plus
> The other versions are there too;


I transcribed much of the version 1 PDF. It has to be cross-checked
against the version 2 tarball since the laser printer they used at
AT&T didn't wrap around and a lot of places the printout got clipped.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.