Related articles |
---|
Self compiling compiler ershc123@nyc.rr.com (ERSHC) (2016-03-31) |
Re: Self compiling compiler 545-066-4921@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2016-03-31) |
Re: Self compiling compiler thomas.goorden@gmail.com (Thomas Goorden) (2016-03-31) |
Re: Self compiling compiler nmh@t3x.org (Nils M Holm) (2016-03-31) |
Re: Self compiling compiler rivers@dignus.com (Thomas David Rivers) (2016-03-31) |
Re: Self compiling compiler alexfrunews@gmail.com (2016-03-31) |
Re: Self compiling compiler jkallup@web.de (Jens Kallup) (2016-03-31) |
Re: Self compiling compiler 545-066-4921@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2016-04-03) |
Re: Self compiling compiler ershc123@nyc.rr.com (ERSHC) (2016-04-02) |
[4 later articles] |
From: | Thomas Goorden <thomas.goorden@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:50:56 +0200 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 16-03-013 |
Injection-Info: | miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="63787"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | tools |
Posted-Date: | 31 Mar 2016 12:35:39 EDT |
Self-compiling compilers are pretty common:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_(compilers)
If it's C you're after, TCC is intentionally small: http://bellard.org/tcc/
Good luck!
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:54 AM, ERSHC <ershc123@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> Can anyone point me to something more appropriate than gcc (which is far
> from small)?
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.