Re: matching tasks to languages, was Writing A Plain English Compiler

Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net>
Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:37:57 -0800

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Writing A Plain English Compiler gerry.rzeppa@pobox.com (Gerry Rzeppa) (2014-11-04)
Re: Writing A Plain English Compiler Pidgeot18@verizon.net (=?UTF-8?Q?Joshua_Cranmer_=f0=9f=90=a7?=) (2014-11-05)
Re: Writing A Plain English Compiler gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2014-11-07)
Re: matching tasks to languages, was Writing A Plain English Compiler genew@telus.net (Gene Wirchenko) (2014-11-10)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:37:57 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 14-11-004 14-11-005 14-11-012
Keywords: syntax, design, OOP
Posted-Date: 11 Nov 2014 14:40:52 EST

On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:23:06 -0500, George Neuner
<gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:


[snip]


>I frequently am amazed at the contortions Java programmers go through
>to solve problems within the restrictive OO model. IMO, "Design
>Patterns" was an admission that too many programmers couldn't use Java
>to solve routine programming problems.


          I bounced off "Design Patterns" myself. It seemed that the
authors would rather do anything but simply instantiate an object.


          I had a uni assignment that I tried to solve using OO. As I
worked my way around it, I realised that OO was not going to happen.
Oh, I could have done it, but the code would have been much longer and
quite difficult to validate/debug.


>[That's as much an indictment of the lack of CS education among
>programmers. Java - somewhat successfully - tried to pander to less
>educated programmers by making simple things simpler, but in doing so
>it made solving many real problems more complicated.]


          I lost a few hours to this on another assignment, because ints
could not be unsigned.


[snip]


Sincerely,


Gene Wirchenko


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.