Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming language available (alpha)

"Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org>
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:09:37 +0200

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2014-09-10)
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2014-09-10)
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2014-09-10)
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua nmh@t3x.org (Nils M Holm) (2014-09-10)
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2014-09-11)
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2014-09-15)
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua nmh@t3x.org (Nils M Holm) (2014-09-20)
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2014-09-21)
Re: OOP vs imperative, was Hello v1.0.3 distributed programming langua kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2014-09-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:09:37 +0200
Organization: Compilers Central
Keywords: OOP, design
Posted-Date: 10 Sep 2014 14:09:51 EDT

You wrote:
> [I've always thought of OOP as being orthogonal to imperative,
> declarative, or functional. But I'm not sure how much it matters.
> Are there any functional OOP languages? -John]


OCaml is both functional and object oriented: http://ocaml.org


--
Nils M Holm < n m h @ t 3 x . o r g > www.t3x.org


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.