Re: Having trouble converting composite variables to intermediate form

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 7:32:01 PM UTC+2, noitalmost wrote:
>
> x := r.a[2] + 5;
>


> After parsing, the Wirl AST fragment looks like:
>
> Assign
> Ident x
> Op +
> RecAccess
> Ident r
> ArrAccess
> Ident a
> Num 2


You have currently


RecAccess(r, ArrAccess(Ident(a), Num(2)))


Note, however, that the array is not `a`, it's `r.a`. The subtree
`ArrAccess(Ident(a), Num(2)) `is incorrect, because you don't have in fact
a variable named `a` of an array type.


Here the record access should take precedence over array access, i.e.
the AST should look like:


ArrAccess(RecAccess(r, Ident(a)), Num(2))

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.