Related articles |
---|
[13 earlier articles] |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-02-24) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-02-24) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? lkrupp@pssw.com (Louis Krupp) (2014-02-24) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-02-24) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? ivan@ootbcomp.com (Ivan Godard) (2014-02-24) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? james.harris.1@gmail.com (James Harris) (2014-02-24) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? hu47121@usenet.kitty.sub.org (2014-02-25) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2014-02-25) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2014-02-25) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? rpw3@rpw3.org (2014-02-25) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2014-02-27) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? noitalmost@cox.net (noitalmost) (2014-02-27) |
Re: Best tools for writing an assembler? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2014-03-01) |
[2 later articles] |
From: | hu47121@usenet.kitty.sub.org (Hannah) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:43:13 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | The Pond |
References: | 14-02-018 14-02-025 14-02-027 14-02-033 |
Keywords: | assembler, tools, comment |
Posted-Date: | 24 Feb 2014 22:18:10 EST |
Hi!
glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
Actually, our moderator wrote:
>-- glen
>[Variable length instructions aren't that hard. You start by assuming
>everything will be the long form, then iterate over the code a few
>times shrinking what you can. That isn't always perfectly optimal
>(which is known to be NP complete), but it's pretty close. -John]
Can't one also go the other way round: Start in the short(est) form and
lengthen as long as needed?
Hannah.
[Shrinking long versions has the advantage that the code is always valid,
even if you miss a few. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.