Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programming la

Hans Aberg <haberg-news@telia.com>
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:12:28 +0200

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[40 earlier articles]
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2012-06-07)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de (Georg Bauhaus) (2012-06-08)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-06-08)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-06-08)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin ehog.hedge@googlemail.com (chris dollin) (2012-06-09)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin mal@wyrd.be (Lieven Marchand) (2012-06-09)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin haberg-news@telia.com (Hans Aberg) (2012-06-10)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2012-06-10)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin blog@rivadpm.com (Alex McDonald) (2012-06-10)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin robin51@dodo.com.au (robin) (2012-06-11)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin torbenm@diku.dk (2012-06-11)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2012-06-11)
Re: Have we reached the asymptotic plateau of innovation in programmin gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-06-11)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Hans Aberg <haberg-news@telia.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:12:28 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 12-03-019 12-03-026 12-03-029 12-06-016
Keywords: design

On 2012/06/07 20:15, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> Mathematicians have an implied operator between symbols. You can't do
> that with multi character names. Not in a way that can make sense, to
> me.


In mathematics, the spacing is different - check out TeX. For example,
the name "sin" is typeset somewhat tighter than implicit multiplication
of the three variables "s", "i" and "n". Unicode has various spaces that
might be used.


Hans



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.