Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target?

glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Thu, 24 May 2012 04:21:43 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? arcfide@sacrideo.us (Aaron W. Hsu) (2012-05-22)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? jeremy.wright@microfocus.com (Jeremy Wright) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? torbenm@diku.dk (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? arcfide@sacrideo.us (Aaron W. Hsu) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? lpsantil@gmail.com (lpsantil@gmail.com) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2012-05-24)
Re: Thoughts on the JVM as a compilation Target? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2012-05-25)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 04:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
References: 12-05-013
Keywords: Java
Posted-Date: 24 May 2012 01:39:32 EDT

Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> wrote:


> What are your thoughts on JVM as a compilation target,
> especially with new languages all targeting high
> performance or multi-core type features?


Some year ago I was wondering about JVM as a target for a C compiler.
It is a little tricky, as there are some things that people expect
even though the C standard doesn't require them.


I once knew about a COBOL compiler for JVM, though I don't know
any more than that.


What language(s) were you thinking about?


-- glen


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.